• Home
• Link
• Humor
• Votes
• Books
• Contact
• Pictures
• Clinton Legacy
• Quotes

Subscribe

Hillary Pads Campaign With Radical Chicanos

Just weeks after naming the leader of an extremist Mexican group to co chair her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton has added yet another controversial Chicano illegal immigration advocate to her team.

The Clinton camp announced with great fanfare this week that the Speaker of the California Assembly, Mexican Democrat Fabian Nunez of Tijuana, is the latest national co chair of her 2008 campaign.

A renowned advocate of illegal immigrants and organizer of huge marches, Nunez actually declared war on California’s governor a few years ago because the governor supports securing the southern border as well as legislative measures to help curb the state’s illegal immigration crisis.

Nunez has for years been a well-known figure in the Chicano and La Raza movements, delivering fiery anti-American speeches and organizing street marches that have featured up to 100,000 rowdy, Mexican flag-waving protestors.

At one such rally in the mid 1990s, Nunez referred to U.S. lawmakers as rednecks and vowed to bring Washington to a standstill to protest what he considered to be anti-immigrant legislation in California.

Nunez was also an activist in a Los Angeles pro illegal alien group (One Stop Immigration and Education) that was federally investigated for misappropriation of federal and state grants. He will undoubtedly have a great relationship with Hillary’s other radical Chicano campaign co chair, Raul Yzaguirre, who for three decades headed the extremist group National Council of La Raza.

Source: Judicial Watch

Rudy stuck a nerve with Hillary: Bill Clinton’s disastrous record of fighting terror

Rudy Guiliani struck a nerve with the Democrats recently when he stated that if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, America will be at risk for another terrorist attack on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001.

Guiliani stated that “They were at war with us before we realized it, going back to ’90s with all the Americans killed by the PLO and Hezbollah and Hamas,” he said. “They came here and killed us in 1993 [with the first attack on New York’s World Trade Center, in which six people died], and we didn’t get it. We didn’t get it that this was a war. Then Sept. 11, 2001, happened, and we got it.”

Hillary respondedby saying, “We have to protect our country from terrorism — it shouldn’t be a Democratic fight or a Republican fight,” Clinton said. “The plain truth is that this administration has done too little to protect our ports, make our mass transit safer and protect our cities. They have isolated us in the world and have let al Qaeda regroup.”

But the plain truth is, her husband had a disastrous record of handling terrorists threats, and did very little to protect our nation.

Read More

Is Hillary Clinton Falling Victim to Overconfidence?

By: John Lillpop

One could easily conclude that based on a recent statement from Ms. Clinton on the campaign trail in Iowa.

She said, “When I walk into the Oval Office in 2009, I’m afraid I’m going to lift up the rug and I’m going to see so much stuff under there. You know, what is it about us always having to clean up after people?”

Sending a Clinton to clean up the Oval Office makes about as much sense as sending Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the Wailing Wall in Israel to pray for Holocaust victims.

Would not be prudent, as they say!

It is prudent, however, to remind Hillary Clinton that should she be elected president in 2008, she will NOT find any of the following dirt under the rug in the Oval Office:

* Those missing files from the Rose Law firm.

* Minutes from secret Gestapo meetings run by Clinton to ram socialized medicine down the throats of the American people.

* Handwritten note from Vince Foster note advising Hillary that he was ending their romantic affair, with the word “KILL!” scribbled in red across the note.

Read More…

Why Women Hate Hillary

By: Susan J. Douglas
We sat around the dinner table, a group of 50-something progressive feminists, talking to a friend from England about presidential politics. We were all for Hillary, weren’t we, he asked. Hillary? We hated Hillary. He was taken aback. Weren’t we her base? Wasn’t she one of us? Why did we hate Hillary?

Of course, a lot of people seem to hate Hillary. According to some polls, anywhere from 39 to 50 percent of respondents claim they’d vote against her no matter what; her “negatives” continue to be high. Many of these are Republicans and men. But many are not. According to a Harris poll in March, 52 percent of married women said they would not vote for her. Nearly half of adults say they dislike her personality and her politics. Unlike her husband, people seem to find her cold and don’t see her connecting with everyday people, and this is especially true for married women. Ironically, it is Gen Xers, those between 31 and 42, who give her the most support.

So what gives? For people like my friends and me, her hawkish position on Iraq and her insistence that the U.S. maintain a military presence there even after the troops are withdrawn have been very disappointing. But it’s more than any specific position. Women don’t trust Hillary. They see her as an opportunist; many feel betrayed by her. Why?

Read More

Hillary’s Problems

By: Emmett Tyrrell

Another week passes, and on The New York Times front page there appears yet another ominous report on the perils facing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential prospects. First the Times reported on the ambivalence of Hillary’s Wellesley classmates toward her. Now the Times reports that a growing number of New York’s black political leaders are looking favorably toward her main rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Barack Obama, who is black. “Obama’s Rise Strains Loyalty on Clinton’s Turf” is the headline. The “turf” in question is New York’s black Democratic electorate. In the 2004 New York state primary, black Democrats comprised 20 percent of their party’s turnout. The Clinton camp has reason to worry.

Expecting Hillary to campaign effectively against Obama in the black community is expecting a lot from this middle-aged suburban lawyer, educated in the Ivy League. So the Clinton campaign is rousing America’s “first black president,” her husband Bill, to address black and Hispanic groups. Actually, when the black novelist Toni Morrison first esteemed the Boy President as our “first black president,” I doubt she recognized the irony. Of all America’s previous presidents, the one who most closely approximates Clinton, in presidential achievements and in personal frailties, is Warren Gamaliel Harding, a much-loved rascal who, irony of ironies, was rumored to have black blood — not a compliment in his day, but neither would it be a compliment then to appraise a president a “rock star” or even a “vaudeville star.” Times change.

Read More @ Town Hall

« Previous Page — Next Page »

Angry Clinton Supporter Declares McCain Will Be Next President

Advertisement

Never Forget

Latest Headlines

• Could Hillary Clinton still come back?
• Bill Clinton: Hillary Never Wanted to be Obama’s VP
• Hillary Clinton tells Ohio supporters: ‘No Palin’
• Clinton keeps mum on Palin as Democrats are lost for words
• To Combat The Effect of Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton Will Campaign For Obama
• Sarah Palin brings the Hillary Clinton era to an end
• Senators urged to back Clinton for new role
• Hill Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned
• Bill and Hillary, at last, leave the stage
• Bill Clinton Vows to Do `Everything’ He Can for Obama