• Home
• Link
• Humor
• Votes
• Books
• Contact
• Pictures
• Clinton Legacy
• Quotes

Subscribe

An Iowa Voter: ‘Is Hillary Clinton not open to voters’ questions?’

Questions about Hillary abound in Iowa: 

I recently read on the New York Times Web site that Hillary Clinton no longer takes questions from Iowa caucus-goers.

The reporter said it's because she wants to protect her front-runner status. After the recent debacle with a man in New Hampton, I can understand why she's doing that.

When asked a tough, but valid question about Iran, she dodged the question and accused the man of being sent by another campaign. Is this really the kind of behavior we want in our next president: evasive, combative, arrogant? It sounds like George Bush all over again.

Here in Iowa, it's not the millions of dollars and bandwagon slogans that matter. We want to know where the candidates stand on the issues. If Clinton can't answer a simple question about a very important Senate vote, she is going to have bigger problems on her hands come January.

I'm going to caucus for a candidate who can defend his positions on the issues and is capable of communicating with caucus-goers. That won't be Clinton.

- Matt Grotheer - Ames, Iowa

Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Treated Volunteer Badly

I came to Iowa as a die-hard Hillary Clinton supporter/volunteer, who was ready to help elect the first woman president of the United States.

I had extra time to spend in Iowa before a trip to Fargo, so I decided to volunteer for a week before I went to Fargo and for two weeks afterward.

Within the first couple of days of arriving, I had seen three field workers cry because of the abuse they took. The volunteers were segregated and treated like second-class citizens. I left after my first week, hoping things would change, but they did not.

I was ignored, even though I asked many people for work to do. So I decided to leave the campaign as a volunteer, knowing that I have been supporting the wrong candidate.

As a former state president of College Democrats and having worked on numerous campaigns, I have never seen people treated so badly. I have officially changed my views: I believe Barack Obama will be the best president of United States.

- James Henson,
Oklahoma City, Okla.

Source:  DesMoines Register

Hillary Clinton should become invisible according to NY Post readers

Below is proof that some people see through Hillary's shameless comments about President Bush and pandering to the left-wing of the Democratic party.  Her exploitation of the war in Iraq is just one reason Hillary Clinton should make herself invisible and go back to Arkansas.

From the New York Post

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is way off base with her remarks about "invisible troops," especially since she voted recently against the war in Iraq with the Mideastern terrorists ("Hillary Ads to Her Appeal on Iowa Airwaves," Aug. 14).

President Bush is a sympathetic individual who cares about every troop who is harmed, but Clinton only heightens the terrorists' acclaim with her foolish remarks.

Ed McGrath

Sayville

Shameless is the only word I can think of to describe what Clinton had to say about President Bush.

Didn't her husband say that he loathed the military, and didn't John Kerry call our military baby killers?

I think this long-term campaigning is beginning to get the best of her.

She should do us all a favor and become invisible.

Chris Michaels

Morganville, N.J.

Please, someone tell Clinton and the rest of the Democratic presidential cabal that neither Bush nor Vice President Dick Cheney is seeking re-election.

It's time for them to stop bitterly attacking those in the White House as if they are a greater pariah than Islamic jihadists.

It's the Democrats who have fostered national division since the start of the Iraqi campaign.

American voters will not forget how they exploited the American people for political expediency during wartime.

Lee Anthony Nieves

Charlotte, N.C.

Clinton is running on her "experience," so it seems she should demand her records as first lady be released so voters can assess that experience.

Or does she want to remain invisible to the voters?

Patti Mijares

Huntington Beach, Calif.

Bill and Hillary Clinton Sold Out America

By Diane Alden 

In 2004, two powerful members of the U.S. Senate instituted something called the India Caucus. New York Sen. Hillary Clinton and Texas Sen. John Cornyn put together an alliance giving special status to foreign interests including what appears to be sale of U.S. visas (student and work) in exchange for favors, campaign contributions, and God only knows what else.

The Senate India Caucus quickly signed 32 members of the Senate. The 2007 110th congress has a total of 37 senators in that caucus, including 18 Democrats, and 19 Republicans. In the House, 176 congressmen belong to the India Caucus, 115 Democrats and 61 Republicans including my own 11th District Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga. I had no idea West Georgia had such a vested interest in India or its needs.

This association and Gingrey's vote in favor of CAFTA suggests whose interests far too many Democrats and Republicans now represent and it rarely includes their district or America's long term future.

Does your representative belong to India? Visit these Web sites to find out:

http://www.usinpac.com/members_house_caucus.asp
http://www.usinpac.com/members_senate_caucus.asp

In 2006, the New York Daily News reported Bill and Hillary Clinton's financial statement including their associations with Indian government and American business interests.

During the Clinton and Bush administrations encouraged the corporate transference of high tech jobs to India and elsewhere. Meanwhile, the U.S. visa went on sale to the highest foreign bidders. It appears India won. Hundreds of thousands of U.S. H-1B visas have gone to Indian foreign nationals.

Without question it is a corporate inspired replacement of Americans, including workers on all ends of the spectrum.

Read more

Hillary’s Cleavage: Who cares? Bill doesn’t.

From the New York Post letters to the editor:

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is so predictable: The reason why she exposed a little cleavage was to offset Elizabeth Edwards' comment that she was acting like a man.

In her calculating mind, I can see her thinking, "Let a man try to do this."

The problem with this strategy is that Clinton is not at all sexy. True, she's a pleasant-looking, middle-aged woman, but she'll never be confused with the fertility symbols at Hooters.

I truly hope Clinton doesn't get a bump in popularity from the cleavage issue. If she does, she'll be campaigning in only a thong by election time.

Paul Izzo, Milford, Conn.

Who cares about Clinton's cleavage? Certainly Bill doesn't, with his history of roving eyes.

Voters should worry more that Clinton, of all the candidates, is the No. 1 recipient in campaign contributions from the famous Washington inside-the-Beltway lobbyists.

They are making an investment for future favors, which would economically benefit their clients.

Ordinary citizens just have their vote and the ability to make a small donation in the $1 to $100 range.

It appears that Clinton is no different from any other career politician looking for advancement to higher office.

Larry Penner, Great Neck

Clinton is glib, poll-driven and a political contortionist who keeps her feet firmly planted on both sides of every issue.

James J. Ring

« Previous Page — Next Page »

Angry Clinton Supporter Declares McCain Will Be Next President

Advertisement

Never Forget

Latest Headlines

• To Combat The Effect of Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton Will Campaign For Obama
• Sarah Palin brings the Hillary Clinton era to an end
• Senators urged to back Clinton for new role
• Hill Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned
• Bill and Hillary, at last, leave the stage
• Bill Clinton Vows to Do `Everything’ He Can for Obama
• It’s All About Me
• Clinton Supporters Say ‘Speech Didn’t Heal’
• Pelosi Tells Disappointed Clinton Supporters to Avoid ‘Victim Politics’
• No End To Bill and Hill - Letters To The Editor